<Unclassified Message, but not Humorous> Some participants like to send messages/documents as categoried or classified, and may include in others uncategorised or unclassified. That is a reasonable approach in reasonable organisations. I see some RFCs as mentioned in [1], that they are humorous that reflect a historic culture or a behavior that some may like to do in a certain date (others may not like to do or be part of). If the date is special then thoes RFCs SHOULD be *historical*. I suggest/request that the IETF stops this humorous RFC publication or try to categories them or distinguish them from our logical work/efforts. I request if they are categorised as informational or experimental then to be obsoleted. I recommend for future RFCs of that type categories to be as *historical* not others (i.e. informational). If those RFCs are not categorising/distinguished as unclassified or humorous, then all RFC may be affected. The reader may not be able to distinguish thoes published documents by IETF (does an organisation care about readers or users of its publications!). You may think to create a new category name for such publication published on April for that interested culture behavior. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day_RFC Regards AB