Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx>, ietf <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first
From: "Wes Beebee (wbeebee)" <wbeebee@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:27:17 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CADnDZ88e4V30C4AfTDMF1-gTEi4qRV-H7R0-Es2oTzkqUgkJRw@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-index: AQHONGUs7oD0J9AT80iuEN0YYKw6Dg==
Thread-topic: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206

>If the date is special then thoes RFCs SHOULD be *historical*.

I thought they should be classified as "hysterical".

- Wes

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first
  - From: Lucy Lynch

References:
- Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes.
Next by Date: Re: team to look at diversity
Previous by thread: Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first
Next by thread: Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]