Re: The RFC Acknowledgement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 8, 2013, at 7:55 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> My personal instincts as an author run somewhat closer to
> Melinda's criterion than to Don's but my bigger concern is that
> trying to make specific rules about this will result in an
> extended rat hole tour that ends up with rules that don't work
> well for edge cases we don't anticipate.

Yes. I tend to acknowledge comments on a draft, and to separately acknowledge comments that included text or which resulted in large changes - I do both Don and Melinda's algorithms. The important thing is, though, to be liberal in what one includes, and to be conservative in the application of legalistic rules.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]