On 12/3/2012 5:58 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
We could certainly say this. It is a true statement.
However, the document is trying to talk about WG I-Ds, not to provide a general
description of everything the IETF and RFC Editor ever does.
...
My answers are "No" and "No".
+1
The existing text was tailored to lay foundation for what comes next,
not to provide a general introduction to I-Ds. The suggested changes
add unnecessary verbosity. Anyone needing a 'complete' understanding of
I-Ds can consult the offered citations.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net