On 12/2/12 11:18 AM, Arturo Servin wrote: > > In Section 2.1, I would add in specifically-inappropriate criteria: > > - Accept an I+D for the merely fact to have a more structured > discussion in the WG. I'm actually not sure about that. It seems to me that in the past we've had working group documents which were not intended for publication, and I think they'd fall under this criterion. I may be misremembering. At any rate I'm not sure I see the value in ruling these out. Melinda