So it is ok to have bad ideas as I+D, possibly harmful for the Internet just to have a structured discussion? Regards, as On 02/12/2012 18:21, Melinda Shore wrote: > On 12/2/12 11:18 AM, Arturo Servin wrote: >> >> In Section 2.1, I would add in specifically-inappropriate criteria: >> >> - Accept an I+D for the merely fact to have a more structured >> discussion in the WG. > > I'm actually not sure about that. It seems to me that in the past > we've had working group documents which were not intended for > publication, and I think they'd fall under this criterion. I may > be misremembering. At any rate I'm not sure I see the value in > ruling these out. > > Melinda >