I would like to express my sadness as well, adding that I am most probably not NomCom eligible.
I was only 23 when one of my freinds, community activist in the students circle of the university, committed a suicide. Three years later it happened again, by one other freind of us.
I feel that there is a danger that this might happen again, especially in this case.
Apparently Marshall still think that he could return to his IETF work in the near future. How could we help him, this is my question, How can we taylor the rules of our work, allowing to go for a sabbatical period and return later, with quick reintegration?
Á bientot,
Géza
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01/11/2012 21:45, Sam Hartman wrote:
...
> At this point, I believe the recall process is the correct process toI agree, with some sadness.
> follow unless there is an approved BCP update.
> In a case where there's been no contact and there's an argument we've
> found a gap in the procedures I can see the argument for creativity.
> However, according to Bob's note, Marshall has been contacted and rather
> than resigning, said he would consider resigning.
> I hope he does.
> Until he does, though, by considering resigning rather than resigning,
> he has implied that there might be a reason not to resign.
> In my mind that moves us out of a situation where creative
> interpretations of vacancy are appropriate.
(I am, as it happens, not NomCom eligible right now.)
Brian