Re: Recall petition for Mr. Marshall Eubanks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/11/2012 21:45, Sam Hartman wrote:
...
> At this point, I believe the recall process is the correct process to
> follow unless there is an approved BCP update.
> In a case where there's been no contact and there's an argument we've
> found a gap in the procedures I can see the argument for creativity.
> However, according to Bob's note, Marshall has been contacted and rather
> than resigning, said he would consider resigning.
> I hope he does.
> Until he does, though, by considering resigning rather than resigning,
> he has implied that there might be a reason not to resign.
> In my mind that moves us out of a situation where creative
> interpretations of vacancy are appropriate.

I agree, with some sadness.

(I am, as it happens, not NomCom eligible right now.)

     Brian


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]