Hi Sam, > So, I'm puzzled by this. my claim was that ISOC needed to approve > process related BCPs. If you take a look at RFC 2031, it supports that > claim. However, I'd kind of expect the other half of this to be in RFC > 2026. I certainly recall us sending things like BCP 101 before the ISOC > BOT. I also think we sent a couple of other documents there because they > were process documents. > However this is clearly more complex than I thought it was. > > Scott, or anyone else with more history, can you tell us a story about > how this works? My recollection from a few years ago is that we put various new process BCPs in front of the ISOC Board and they minuted that they took note of them. They were specifically not asked to approve them. It's quite possible that this has been overlooked in some cases. Somebody would have to grep the ISOC Board minutes to be sure. Brian