Re: [RFC 3777 Update for Vacancies]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bob,

I've read through the draft, and would prefer a different approach.  Since we already have a recall procedure for contested removals, this draft should focus itself on uncontested removals, and really just absense.  How do you test if something is uncontested?  Easy enough: ask the IETF community.  If a single person objects, let's call that "contested" and go with the other procedure.

Eliot

On 10/24/12 6:14 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
The draft that proposes changes to the RFC3777/BCP10 to deal with vacancies is now available.

  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-genarea-bcp10upd-00

Bob

--------------------

From: Internet-Drafts@xxxxxxxx 
To: i-d-announce@xxxxxxxx 
Reply-to: Internet-Drafts@xxxxxxxx 
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-genarea-bcp10upd-00.txt 
X-C5I-RSN: 1/0/935/46939/50333 
 
A new Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. 
 
Title : RFC 3777 Update for Vacancies 
Author(s) : D. Crocker, et al 
Filename : draft-ietf-genarea-bcp10upd 
Pages : 4  
Date : Oct. 24, 2012  
 
BCP 10 (RFC 3777) specifies IETF processes for selection, 
confirmation and recall of appointees to IETF positions. It also 
refers to the mechanism of resignation as part of a sequence that 
moves a sitting member to a new IETF position. However it does not 
more generally deal with vacancies created by resignation, death or 
uncontested, sustained absence from participation. This update to 
BCP 10 specifies procedures for handling vacancies. 
 
A URL for this Internet-Draft is: 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-genarea-bcp10upd-00.txt 
 
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: 
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ 
 



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]