ISOC BOT and Process BCPs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "SM" == SM  <sm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:


So, I'm puzzled by this.  my claim was that ISOC needed to approve
process related BCPs.  If you take a look at RFC 2031, it supports that
claim.  However, I'd kind of expect the other half of this to be in RFC
2026.  I certainly recall us sending things like BCP 101 before the ISOC
BOT. I also think we sent a couple of other documents there because they
were process documents.
However this is clearly more complex than I thought it was.

Scott, or anyone else with more history, can you tell us a story about
how this works?


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]