Re: Failing to convince an IETF WG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/26/2012 1:55 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:

On 26 Sep 2012, at 03:18, tglassey <tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The issue is how to remove the political BS which clouds so many initiatives.
Disagree that this is *the* issue. We also get technical BS and even stuff that's utterly incompressible if you can believe that,
We (none of us as technologists) have any business in politics. Further the IETF is not a PAC and you dont want that level of review here AFAIK.

If the IETF becomes a PAC then the whole world changes. This is why it is not acceptable for the IETF to prevent any standards process from completing or interfere with any process. Its necessary to be provably fair and open (right?)...

Todd

S



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5292 - Release Date: 09/25/12





--
//Confidential Mailing - Please destroy this if you are not the intended recipient.



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]