Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site

To: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:36:29 +0100
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5049F6DD.7040404@dcrocker.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0

On 07/09/2012 14:30, Dave Crocker wrote:
> The IESG should not be /required/ to honor a court order?

whose court order?

Nick

References:
- Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site
  - From: Stephan Wenger
- Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site
  - From: Pete Resnick
- Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site
  - From: Randy Bush
- Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site
  - From: Eliot Lear
- Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site
  - From: Stewart Bryant
- Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site
  - From: Eliot Lear
- Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site
  - From: Dave Crocker