On 9/7/2012 2:42 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
"An I-D will only be removed from the public I-D archive if legally
required to do so."
That is where I was aiming, albeit with s/will/may/. Again, I recommend
that Jorge review. Nothing in this policy should REQUIRE the IESG to
act, or set that expectation.
The IESG should not be /required/ to honor a court order?
In addition, the more discretion the policy affords the IESG, the more
it can -- unintentionally, of course -- run the risk of doing censoring.
But yes, the draft policy text needs to be vetted by counsel.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net