RE: Oauth blog post

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 16:58 -0400, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
> From: Murray S. Kucherawy [superuser@xxxxxxxxx]
> 
> I think it's impossible to determine with certainty whether someone
> standing at the mic and asserting a position is doing so based on what
> an employer is insisting on doing, or that person's opinion.

But it is possible, over a period of time, to get a good estimate of
whether someone promotes technically poor solutions that are
commercially advantageous for their employers.

Yes; those people generally (but not always) have fairly poor success rates; OTOH, a lot of nonsense can be accomplished
with sufficient manpower.


Indeed, relative to our fundamental principle of openness, "All may
speak; not all are listened to.", in order to be listened to, someone
has to spend some time to establish a reputation for technical quality
of their contributions, and not being a shill for poor ideas advanced
by their employers.

I suppose that that may be one reason why my experiences with corporate manipulation (or domination, if you prefer) of the IETF have been of
people with those very reputations blocking good ideas that threatened the interests of their  employer.  It's pretty hard to get things done in the IETF,
but quite easy to stop things, especially if one is in a position of power.


Dale


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]