Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Thomas Narten <narten@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
From: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:27:28 -0700
Cc: nvo3@xxxxxxxx, IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "iesg@xxxxxxxx" <iesg@xxxxxxxx>, stbryant@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <201204231707.q3NH7DNd007563@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Thomas Narten <narten@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I recall during the BOF someone
> (Jon Hudson?) stating that industry is already well ahead of the IETF
> in this space...

Isn't that nearly always the case?

Anoop

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
  - From: Joel jaeggli

References:
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
  - From: Stewart Bryant
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
  - From: Thomas Narten

Prev by Date: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Next by Date: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Previous by thread: Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
Next by thread: Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]