> From: Pete Resnick [presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Before posting this Last Call (and the similar one for > draft-ietf-sieve-convert), the documents *were* returned to the SIEVE WG > to review the situation. With minimal complaint from the WG and no > indication that the WG wished to change their decision on the documents, > the chairs asked that I simply put it to the entire community as a Last > Call. So I believe anything other than "go ahead with publication as is" > will be done only if that is the consensus of the IETF community as a > whole. The SIEVE chairs and I will be monitoring the discussion. OK, that resolves all my objections. The "higher pay grades" (IESG and IAB) may have policy concerns, but that is not my expertise. Dale _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf