> From: Adrian Farrel [adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > > In my opinion, this second last call should be suspended until this > significant breach of the IETF's IPR policy set out in BCP79 has been > resolved. > [...] > I believe the document should be returned to the working group who are > the main victims of the disruptive behaviour by the author. If the facts are as outlined by Adam Roach, this is the only thing to do. Dale _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf