Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> In a small registry like this, it is useful to have something in the
> box in the table that makes it less likely that the value will be squatted
> on.
>
> In the above example it is clearer in the 0..7 case that there are only
> two free values and I will need a real good use case.
>
> In the 0..5 case, someone might be more tempted to say, they are only
> using up to 5 I will take 6 and hope no one notices.

Fair point, and all the more reason to reject the errata report.

Barry
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]