Errata 2684 was entered against RFC 5226, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs". After discussion with one of the RFC authors and IANA staff, I rejected the errata. The errata author is saying that in many registries, there are no "unreserved" values. For registries where there are a finite number of entries possible, the "unreserved" has a clear meaning. For registries with an unbounded number of potential entries (such as media-types), the errata author is claiming that the "unreserved" label does not make sense. I'd like to know what others think about this errata. Russ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf