Re: "class E" (was: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dec 5, 2011, at 4:58 PM, David Conrad wrote:

> On Dec 5, 2011, at 1:13 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
>> this is a much stronger argument for a "dear customer, either renumber or upgrade your
>> hardware" position
> 
> I'd imagine the vast majority of the customers of ISPs who are facing this issue would react either with anger or non-comprehension if presented with such a position. If you were running such a network, would you risk it?

Precisely. This proposition would result in both (1) increased support costs*, and (2) irritated customers that decide to switch ISPs rather than renumber or upgrade. We can't (realistically) expect ISPs to choose this.

The sad / funny thing is that result #2 rewards ISPs that use squat space or globally unique blocks...

Cheers,
-Benson

* - e.g. 30-60 min toll-free phone call with a technician, which might actually cost more than the profit margin on some residential broadband services

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]