On 01/12/2011, at 9:50 PM, t.petch wrote: > 2.3 > Is undefined formally defined? This section suggests that 'undef' or 'null', > inter alia, may be used to undefine a variable while 3.2 uses 'null'. I see no > more formal definition of how to undefine a variable, as opposed to it having a > value or having an empty value. Based on previous feedback, we're making a forward reference to 3.2.1 to clarify this. > 1.2 > worth pointing out that 'reserved' and 'unreserved' are formally defined in 1.5, > to stop people reaching for RFC3986. If this is an issue, I'd actually prefer to place the notational conventions section higher in the document. Thoughts? > The examples are rather complicated. If I have a month to spare, I will work my > way through them by which time, were I to find anything, > doubtless it would be erratum time and no longer LC time. > (How simple life was in the days of -00). Thanks for the feedback, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf