Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

[Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sep 10, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:

I do not think the following types of comments should be considered as
objections when judging this sort of consensus:

1) You are not solving the most important problem

I don't think that was anybody's objection.  Rather, the objection were against change for the sake of change without any convincing argument that the change would improve things; and/or that the changes would actually make it more difficult to improve things.

2) This will not do any good

IMO, that is a valid objection.   Stability in our process is desirable; therefore change merely for the sake of change is undesirable.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf