Hi. I feel it's reasonable for me to speak up since I have not done so in over a year on this document so my opinion probably has not been counted. 1) I support moving to a two level process. 2) I've generally supported versions of this document I have read. I have not read this version in detail. In regard to more global issues. I do not think the following types of comments should be considered as objections when judging this sort of consensus: 1) You are not solving the most important problem 2) This will not do any good Statements of those forms can be combined with objections. "This will not do any good and might do harm so I don't support it," clearly is an objection. Objections can be as simple and non-specific as "I don't like it," or more actionable. More thought out objections carry more weight in some senses. I certainly would hate to see us block on someone simply saying "I don't like it." Either enough people say that that we fail to have rough consensus or not enough people say that and we move on. More detailed objections may be worth blocking on for a time to try and resolve; we seem to be past point of diminishing returns here. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf