Sam Hartman wrote: > > 1) I support moving to a two level process. I don't, and there were some other things in the document (last time I read) that to which I dissent. > > I do not think the following types of comments should be considered as > objections when judging this sort of consensus: > > 1) You are not solving the most important problem > > 2) This will not do any good These are not "objection", but when gauging "consent", then counting them as "consent" rather than "no consent" or "dissent" would IMO be inappropriate. "objections" is stuff that needs to be addressed by issue resolution prior to any gauging/judging of consent. -Martin _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf