Re: 2119bis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/30/2011 06:07 PM, Bill McQuillan wrote:

How about recommending SHOULD ... BECAUSE to encourage the author
to justify the SHOULD.

+1

Although saying something like this should do: "If there's a SHOULD clause in the document, the document MUST provide background and rationale for making the behaviour optional.

For an implementor it's often pretty hard to decide whether to implement functionality marked as SHOULD given that he has zero context and no idea whether the reason he has for not implementing the feature is at all in line with RFC authors' intentions.

Martin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]