Re: 2119bis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/30/2011 07:58 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 08/30/2011 07:35 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
>>> On Aug 30, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> On 08/30/2011 06:54 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
>>>>> I think you're overgeneralizing.  My experience is that judicious use of
>>>>> SHOULD seems to make both protocols and protocol specifications simpler;
>>>>> trying to nail everything down makes them more complex.
>>>>
>>>> But using SHOULD does not make the implementation less complex, it simply
>>>> decreases the complexity for the *author* and increases the probability that two
>>>> independent implementations will have interoperability problems.
>>>
>>> To the extent that SHOULD is causing interoperability problems, it may be that some authors are misusing SHOULD.  But it's not an inherent problem with SHOULD.
>>>
>>>> As an implementer, I would ban all SHOULD/SHOULD NOT/RECOMMENDED/NOT RECOMMENDED.
>>>
>>> I'm an implementor also, and I've found SHOULD to be very helpful.  
>>
>> Yes, it is very helpful in convincing one's PHB that one does not have to
>> implement something, or in convincing another company to reactivate a feature
>> during interop tests because one did not bother to implement it.
> 
> 
> Rather than vaguely attacking SHOULD, maybe it would be more illuminating to cite specific examples?

It is difficult because of a mix of NDAs, employment confidentiality agreements
and desire to not single out individuals.  I'll send you an example in a private
email.

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Personal email: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Professional email: petithug@xxxxxxx
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk5dBA0ACgkQ9RoMZyVa61cu4gCfTBpCbDMdZry14MxAA32zhFe8
oMwAn3dTiHuqO90Kb9SmC0etND8YT9px
=Nht0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]