On 2011-08-14 06:29, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
...
> I really have to wonder if the entire yes/no-obj/discuss voting model is
> appropriate for document advancement. For initial approval at proposed, sure,
> having the ability to "discuss" the document makes all sorts of sense. But
> for subsequent steps that virtue is a lot obvious, to me at least.
s/lot/lot less/
I pretty much agree, although one form of discuss might be
reasonable: "This document needs to be recycled at Proposed
Standard because of the following *observed* interoperability
problem:...".
In other words, once we have got this BCP out (soon, please),
the IESG should update the DISCUSS criteria specifically to
narrow them for the PS->IS transition.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf