ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I really have to wonder if the entire yes/no-obj/discuss voting model > is appropriate for document advancement. For initial approval at > proposed, sure, having the ability to "discuss" the document makes > all sorts of sense. But for subsequent steps that virtue is a lot > obvious, to me at least. This, IMHO, is the right question: Does yes/no-obj/discuss resolve the right issues when advancing from PS to DS? There is a perception, at least, that any AD can block progress to DS (though in fact the process is more complicated, that's the way it's perceived). I could somewhat-seriously suggest that the IESG shouldn't have to vote at all on advancement to DS -- the right issues are questions of fact which could perfectly well be delegated. (And wearing my Narrative-Scribe hat, I know how confusing it is for IESG members to figure out what's expected of them when the question is advancement of maturity level.) -- John Leslie <john@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf