> On 2011-08-14 06:29, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > ... > > I really have to wonder if the entire yes/no-obj/discuss voting model is > > appropriate for document advancement. For initial approval at proposed, sure, > > having the ability to "discuss" the document makes all sorts of sense. But > > for subsequent steps that virtue is a lot obvious, to me at least. > s/lot/lot less/ Yes, sorry. > I pretty much agree, although one form of discuss might be > reasonable: "This document needs to be recycled at Proposed > Standard because of the following *observed* interoperability > problem:...". > In other words, once we have got this BCP out (soon, please), > the IESG should update the DISCUSS criteria specifically to > narrow them for the PS->IS transition. +1 Ned _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf