> On 12.08.2011 21:02, Martin Rex wrote: > > On 8/11/2011 9:37 AM, The IESG wrote: > >> The IESG has received a request from the Yet Another Mail WG (yam) to > >> consider the following document: > >> - 'Message Submission for Mail' > >> <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> as a Full Standard > >> > >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > >> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2011-08-25. Exceptionally, comments may be > >> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > > > I'm wondering wheter there should be an informative reference to rfc6186. > This question was one of two points raised during WGLC by Derek Diget > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00615.html > It was decided that the current deployment of SRV doesn't quite justify > supporting it in a Full Standard document. I really wish it were otherwise, but I find myself having to agree with this assessment. It would be a different thing if this was just now coming up for approval at proposed, but we're way past that. > > and I am concerned about the security mess around SMTP-AUTH (rfc4954) > > (for which this document is not responsible, but which it also > > does not mention). > This question was raised by Chris Newman on Fri, 30 Apr 2010. > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00420.html > There was a somewhat deeper discussion, but the conclusion was the same as > yours, namely that it's not the responsibility of 4409bis, and that > it would be a serious mistake to clutter 4409bis up with some of the > details that have been suggested. Even at full standard, authentication > details are best incorporated by reference to other documents than can be > updated when or as necessary. > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00434.html +1 Ned _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf