On 01/08/2011, at 2:50 PM, John C Klensin wrote: > > I've noticed that lots of people (myself often included) are > often sufficiently wasted by Friday morning to be largely > disfunctional (certainly "less coherent than normal"). I'm > prepared to believe that pushing back lunch would make it even > worse for some people, but it may be that the best solution to > that problem is a better breakfast or snacks that can be brought > into the meeting rooms (or eaten during a _very_ short break as > distinct from 90 minutes of lunch break). This is better. Some people will still doubtless complain. > > With at least some facilities, getting finished earlier would > also reduce costs; I assume I'm not the only one who would like > to see that go straight to the registration fees. +1 > So I think this is a good idea if it is feasible... even though > my preference would be to go back to ending at noon (or 11:30 or > earlier) on Friday by getting more efficient about how we use > time earlier in the week and more selective about who and what > gets time at all. +1 -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf