Hi Roni, Thank you for reviewing my draft. Comments inline.... On Mon, April 11, 2011 5:11 am, Roni Even wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you > may receive. > > Minor issues: > > 1. In section 8.5 and 8.6 the draft says that "If no more password > pre-processing techniques are supported the exchange MUST be > terminated." > Reading section 6, I thought that NONE MUST be supported for > interoperability purpose. One of the valid techniques for password pre-processing is "none". That doesn't mean that there isn't a technique, it means the technique is to perform no pre-processing on the password (treat it as a raw blob of bits). > 2. In section 8.1 and in figure 1 and figure 2 is there a maximum value > for "counter"? No there isn't, but it is doubtful the number will get very large. The probability that more than n iterations is necessary will be roughly (1-(r/2p))^n, where r is the order and p is the prime, and that number rapidly approaches zero as n increases. > Nits/editorial comments: > > 1. In section 1 just before 1.1 you have "suceed" instead of > "succeed" > > 2. In section 4 third bullet "an" instead of "and" > > 3. In section 4.2 "Two elementx" instead of "Two elements" > > 4. In section 5 second row "authenticaiton" should be > "authentication" > > 5. In section 6 fourth row "identitcal" instead of "identical" Thank you for catching all of these. regards, Dan. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf