Re: TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/02/2011 10:08 p.m., Joe Touch wrote:

> On 2/2/2011 5:04 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> ...
>>> At the least, it's worth noting that geolocation is already broken by
>>> tunnels, and that IP addressing does not ensure geographic proximity
>>> before attributing breakage on NATs or other sharing.
>>
>> Tunnels need not break geo-location. -- They do not masquerade the
>> source address. Or am I missing something?
> 
> When I tunnel using an ISI address, whomever sees my address thinks I'm
> in California.
[..]

Ok.. I see. I was thinking about tunnels in the infrastructure. -- those
are transparent in this respect.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@xxxxxxxxxxx || fgont@xxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]