Re: TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/2/2011 5:24 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
On 02/02/2011 10:08 p.m., Joe Touch wrote:

On 2/2/2011 5:04 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
...
At the least, it's worth noting that geolocation is already broken by
tunnels, and that IP addressing does not ensure geographic proximity
before attributing breakage on NATs or other sharing.

Tunnels need not break geo-location. -- They do not masquerade the
source address. Or am I missing something?

When I tunnel using an ISI address, whomever sees my address thinks I'm
in California.
[..]

Ok.. I see. I was thinking about tunnels in the infrastructure. -- those
are transparent in this respect.

Yes. It's tunnels at the endpoints I'm using as an example here.

Joe
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]