Re: TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/02/2011 10:24 p.m., Fernando Gont wrote:
>> On 2/2/2011 5:04 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
>> ...
>>>> At the least, it's worth noting that geolocation is already broken by
>>>> tunnels, and that IP addressing does not ensure geographic proximity
>>>> before attributing breakage on NATs or other sharing.
>>>
>>> Tunnels need not break geo-location. -- They do not masquerade the
>>> source address. Or am I missing something?
>>
>> When I tunnel using an ISI address, whomever sees my address thinks I'm
>> in California.
> [..]

And one might argue that, in this type of scenario, this "breakeage" of
geo-location might, in some cases, be desirable.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@xxxxxxxxxxx || fgont@xxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]