Title: AW: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary
Hi Roni, I issued the 05 version before I was aware of your review (since your mail got somehow lost in a spam filter). Robert pointed out your review to me and instructed me to note it to the RFC editor. I won’t forget it. Thanks again for your review, Karl Von: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@xxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Montag, 03. Jänner 2011 08:17
An: Karl Heinz Wolf; 'General Area Review Team'; draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'IETF-Discussion list'
Betreff: RE: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary Hi Karl, I looked at the 05 version and it does not look like you fixed the nits Roni From: Karl Heinz Wolf [mailto:karlheinz.wolf@xxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 10:28 AM
To: Roni Even; General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: IETF-Discussion list
Subject: AW: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary Roni,
thank you for your review and please apologize my delayed response.
I agree to your comments, the 2. one is really a good catch!
Thank you,
Karl
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx im Auftrag von Roni Even
Gesendet: Sa 12/4/2010 4:41
An: 'General Area Review Team'; draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'IETF-Discussion list'
Betreff: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary
Hi,
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-04
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2010-12-04
IETF LC End Date: 2010-12-14
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Experimental RFC. There are some nits
Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
1. In the abstract the document starts with LoST, Please expand to Location-to-Service Translation
2. At the end of section 3.2 in the note, I think that the first "getServiceListBoundary" should be " getServiceBoundary"
Roni Even |
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf