Re: IETF Attendance by continent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I also certainly didn't see consensus for 1 1 1. I got the sense there was a good bit of support for 2 1 1 and some for 3 2 1.

BTW, the survey that just went out lacks 2 1 1 as choice, a seemingly glaring error given that many on this thread seemed to support it and it most closely matched the meeting attendance.

David

On Aug 27, 2010 2:56 PM, "Yoav Nir" <ynir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Aug 27, 2010, at 12:18 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

>
> On 8/26/2010 2:08 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:...

I didn't get that this was the consensus, and for me at least, although I'm technically in Asia, getting to Europe or North America is much easier than getting to any of the East Asian countries.

I think 3:2:1 is still the way to go, although 2:1:1 is also acceptable.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org...

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]