Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Moreover, several of the dissatisfied seem to feel that anything less than total agreement requires yet another frontal assault on that disagreement. The present thread, if memory serves, got started by someone who decided that, since his ranting on another list didn't achieve the desired gnashing of teeth and rending of garments, he'd try again on the IETF list.
While the original post in the train thread may or may not have been unpleasantly whiny, I think some excellent points have been raised and the discussion hasn't deteriorated to such an extent that it needs a moderator. Some really nice places are terrible meeting locations and some places that aren't that well-liked as tourist destinations are excellent meeting locations. Trying to understand the differentiators strikes me as a completely worthwhile exercise. But in the meantime the discussion has thrown some light on the requirements definition process, eh? Melinda _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf