Re: IETF Attendance by continent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 27, 2010, at 12:18 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> 
> On 8/26/2010 2:08 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
>> Thank you for providing this but this data seems to support something closer
>> to 2-1-1 than 1-1-1
> ...
>> (and sorry I just joined the thread now - been on vacation )
> 
> 
> Cullen,
> 
> The rest of the thread explored this issue by a number of us, looking at it in 
> different way.  Is your push-back to Bob based on a review of that additional 
> discussion?
> 
> I'm asking because I took there to be a reasonable consensus from that that 
> 1-1-1 made the most sense.

I didn't get that this was the consensus, and for me at least, although I'm technically in Asia, getting to Europe or North America is much easier than getting to any of the East Asian countries.

I think 3:2:1 is still the way to go, although 2:1:1 is also acceptable.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]