On 8/26/2010 2:08 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
Thank you for providing this but this data seems to support something closer
to 2-1-1 than 1-1-1
...
(and sorry I just joined the thread now - been on vacation )
Cullen,
The rest of the thread explored this issue by a number of us, looking at it in
different way. Is your push-back to Bob based on a review of that additional
discussion?
I'm asking because I took there to be a reasonable consensus from that that
1-1-1 made the most sense.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf