I read the thread, but I still don't see how people come to 1-1-1, could you enlighten me. Seriously, I know this sounds facetiously but in the case, I really am trying to understand how you come to that conclusion out of this data. On Aug 26, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > On 8/26/2010 2:08 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote: > > Thank you for providing this but this data seems to support something closer > > to 2-1-1 than 1-1-1 > ... > > (and sorry I just joined the thread now - been on vacation ) > > > Cullen, > > The rest of the thread explored this issue by a number of us, looking at it in > different way. Is your push-back to Bob based on a review of that additional > discussion? > > I'm asking because I took there to be a reasonable consensus from that that > 1-1-1 made the most sense. > > d/ > -- > > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > Cullen Jennings For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf