Re: Varying meeting venue -- why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 12, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:

>> I think Vancouver would be an excellent city for a recurring North American
>> meeting.  There is a reasonable convenience factor in terms of nearby
>> hotels, restuarants and food markets (there's an excellent one just a couple
>> blocks from the venue).  However, based on the poll, it seemed that folks
>> preferred Quebec City, which suggests that the majority of folks don't favor
>> the idea of returning to the same city.
> 
> One thing this suggests to me is that the people who are prone to
> taking the survey favour the idea of variety.  I dismember how many
> survey responses we had, and how the responses broke down when
> categorized by number of IETF meetings attended, so I can't be sure,
> here.  But I'm guessing that many of the responses came from the
> long-timers who will go wherever the meeting is, and that not so many
> came from the folks who are relatively new and are considering
> increasing their participation.

You can check out the results and filter them in a variety of ways here:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/sr.aspx?sm=t_2fbbgsnKxiEZQtkqJnseRhFhKYsLmoL7UYsdeKlPJNE_3d

Ray


> 
> Barry
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]