Re: Varying meeting venue -- why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I think Vancouver would be an excellent city for a recurring North American
> meeting.  There is a reasonable convenience factor in terms of nearby
> hotels, restuarants and food markets (there's an excellent one just a couple
> blocks from the venue).  However, based on the poll, it seemed that folks
> preferred Quebec City, which suggests that the majority of folks don't favor
> the idea of returning to the same city.

One thing this suggests to me is that the people who are prone to
taking the survey favour the idea of variety.  I dismember how many
survey responses we had, and how the responses broke down when
categorized by number of IETF meetings attended, so I can't be sure,
here.  But I'm guessing that many of the responses came from the
long-timers who will go wherever the meeting is, and that not so many
came from the folks who are relatively new and are considering
increasing their participation.

Barry
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]