Mike, On Aug 11, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Michael StJohns wrote: >> While personally I agree (as in I have no idea what I will be doing in 2017), in order to schedule meetings and avoid conflicts with other organizations I don't see any alternative to set these dates into the future. Once they are published other organizations see them and make their schedules around ours. So I think they > > I agree they have to be firm but: > "I don't know that the IAOC should consider the 2014-2017 dates firm quite yet." - we have time... or is there some absolute deadline the IAOC is working against for 2017? Or even for 2014? > I suppose my definition of "firm" is that since they have been published they won't change unless there is a strong reason. They were selected to avoid conflicts with other organizations. Bob _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf