Re: Ad Hoc BOFs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/5/10 7:51 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
>>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>     >> - the room should be a regular room (mp3 stream)
> 
>     Paul> I don't think the MP3 streaming happens after the last regular
>     Paul> meeting is finished. The mics had been removed from the rooms
>     Paul> well before the nonBoFs happened in Maastricht.

normally it actually streams all night. In maastricht the due to thefts
from the facility during setup we removed the recorders every night
after the last session.

>     >> - the secretariat should consider having one fewer regular track
>     >> on Monday/Tuesday.
> 
>     Paul> Fully disagree. We had a lot of contention for real IETF slots
>     Paul> at this meeting, and I don't want to see folks fall back to
>     Paul> non-WG meetings.
> 
> Yes there certainly is contention, but I know at least one WG that did
> not use one of their two slots. 
> 
> I also experienced a number of WGs (all remote) where there were
> multiple presentations which were:
>          a) not related to any draft I could find.
>          b) not uploaded beforehand.
>          c) not clearly related to any action of the WG.
> 
> (no Paul, none of them in IPSECME)
> 
> I contend that we use our in-person meeting time very poorly, and that
> we need less meeting time, not more.
> 
> Providing an outlet for presentations like this would, I think, make it
> easier for WG chairs to stick to the action items at hand.
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]