Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam,

The burden of proof rests on those like you who wish to change the
independent stream from a respected independent publishing channel to
something subservient to the Area Directors, a change which seems
entirely gratuitous without any historically demonstrated need.

Donald

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Sam Hartman<hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Elz <kre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>    Robert> Then note that this is exactly the same ralationship that
>    Robert> the RFC editor should have with the IETF.
>
> I disagree for reasons I have previously stated.
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]