Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Olaf" == Olaf Kolkman <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Olaf> On Sep 8, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:

> Tim, I definitely agree with you that it should be the IETF community
    >> that is last called.  Normally, the IESG judges IETF consensus.
    >> However, if it makes the IAB more comfortable for the IAB chair
    >> to do the consensus call, that's fine with me.  If we do that
    >> we'd need to make it clear how this interacts with the IETF
    >> appeals process.



    Olaf> Sam,

    Olaf> the underlying point of my question is that the streams are
    Olaf> independent and that the IETF (stream) has no say about the
    Olaf> other streams. IETF consensus or not. 

Right; I think I made it fairly clear in my reply to John Klensin that
I disagreed fairly strongly with that and argued why I believed that
the IETF needs a special role to attach a note to something.  No
discussion prior or since has changed my mind.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]