Olaf, I meant the IETF community. Since the note would exist to clarify the relationship with documents developed by the IETF community, that seems the right one to evaluate whether a note is needed. As to who calls the consensus, that is a tricky one. How about the IAB chair? Tim On 9/8/09 10:36 AM, "Olaf Kolkman" <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sep 8, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Polk, William T. wrote: > >> I believe Sam's suggestion offers a good compromise position: if the >> IESG >> and RFC Editor do not come to an agreement, we should last call the >> proposed >> IESG Note and let the community determine whether (1) this is an >> exceptional >> case meriting a note and (2) if the text accurately clarifies the >> relationship. > > > Which community, The IETF community or the wider RFC community? And > who calls the consensus? > > > > --Olaf > > > ________________________________________________________ > > Olaf M. Kolkman NLnet Labs > Science Park 140, > http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/ 1098 XG Amsterdam > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf