Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sep 8, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Polk, William T. wrote:

I believe Sam's suggestion offers a good compromise position: if the IESG and RFC Editor do not come to an agreement, we should last call the proposed IESG Note and let the community determine whether (1) this is an exceptional
case meriting a note and (2) if the text accurately clarifies the
relationship.


Which community, The IETF community or the wider RFC community? And who calls the consensus?



--Olaf


________________________________________________________

Olaf M. Kolkman                        NLnet Labs
                                       Science Park 140,
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/               1098 XG Amsterdam

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]